There Are Several Ways to Check the Status of Your Immigration Case

Whether you want to apply for citizenship in the United States, are seeking a green card or work visa, want to bring a family member to the U.S. adopt a child from another country, or you qualify for refugee status, the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) office offers resources to help navigate the immigration process. After youve filed for your particular situation, you can check your immigration case  status  online, where you can sign up for updates via text or email. You can also find out about your status by phone, or make an appointment to discuss your case with a USCIS official in person.   Online Create an account at  USCIS My Case Status so you can check your status online. Youll need to sign up for either an account for yourself if you are seeking the status of your case, or as a representative of someone else if you are checking on a relative who is in the immigration process. Whether youre applying yourself or for a family member, youll need basic information such as official name, date of birth, address, and the country of citizenship to answer security questions during the registration process. Once youve signed up, you can log in, enter your 13-character application receipt number, and track progress of your case. From your  USCIS account, you can sign up for automatic case status updates via email or text message to a U.S. cell phone number whenever an  update has occurred. By Phone or Mail You can also call and send mail regarding your case status. Call the National Customer Service Center at 1-800-375-5283, follow the voice prompts, and have your application receipt number ready. If you filed an application with your local USCIS Field Office, you can write directly to that office for an update. In your letter, be sure to include: Your name, address, and (if different) your name as it appears on your applicationYour Alien number, or  A-numberYour date of birthThe date and place your application was filedYour application receipt numberA copy of the most recent notice sent to you by the USCIS, if you have received oneThe date and office where you were fingerprinted as well as the location of your interview, if it has taken place or been assigned yet In Person If you want to talk to someone face-to-face about your case status, make an InfoPass appointment  and bring: Your A-numberThe date and place your application was filedYour application receipt numberCopies of any notices sent to you by the USCIS Additional Resources Find out how long it will take to get your visa. You can also look up local processing times for USCIS applications and petitions.USCIS offers a toll-free military help line exclusively for members of the United States military and their immediate families.Looking for Diversity Visa green card lottery results? Starting with DV-2010, diversity visa status information has been available online.

The Road Not Taken By Robert Frost - 1287 Words

Life presents many decisions to be made. Some choices can be decided by individuals and others are left to fate. Robert Frost is widely known for his examinations of philosophical topics, such as fate, that have generated influential writings and relatable themes. His ability to capture nature only furthers the beauty of these philosophies. â€Å"The Road Not Taken† depicts Frost’s ideas on decision making with the use of symbolism of two paths through poetry. The effects of the two paths and the difficulty of the decision are furthered through the tone used to describe the differences in paths. Frost creates a somber tone, with a hint of hopefulness, to allude to the decision that is to come and the role that fate plays in the poem. The use of†¦show more content†¦With the beauty of fall and the two roads, the atmosphere remains somber within the path of the forest. However, the tone becomes one of regret quickly. The narrator knows that the decision will have long term effects on the life that develops from the choice. â€Å"And sorry I could not travel both/ And be one traveler, long I stood,† reveals this sense of tension between making a conscious decision or leaving it up to fate (Frost 241). Standing present at the fork for a long time, allows for the tension to build between the narrator and nature, only furthering the somber tone. With the emphasis on contemplation, the reader learns that the poem is not simply about the paths. The paths are symbols for decision making; and the two components of that being individual choice or fate. With the narrator needing to make a decision, the tone changes to one of tension, which is expressed in the coming line. The narrator experiences this pressure with nature, but also with decision making. â€Å"And looked down one as far as I could/ To where it bent in the undergrowth,† reveals that only to one bend, on one path, can the narrator see what lies ahead (Frost 242). With the failure to see further down the path, the narrator places strain on themselves to make a decision that will have the best outcome. The two paths create a symbol for this anxiety in which individuals have on making decisions. The inability to predict the future forces an individual to place trust in

The Road Not Taken By Robert Frost - 1287 Words

Life presents many decisions to be made. Some choices can be decided by individuals and others are left to fate. Robert Frost is widely known for his examinations of philosophical topics, such as fate, that have generated influential writings and relatable themes. His ability to capture nature only furthers the beauty of these philosophies. â€Å"The Road Not Taken† depicts Frost’s ideas on decision making with the use of symbolism of two paths through poetry. The effects of the two paths and the difficulty of the decision are furthered through the tone used to describe the differences in paths. Frost creates a somber tone, with a hint of hopefulness, to allude to the decision that is to come and the role that fate plays in the poem. The use of†¦show more content†¦With the beauty of fall and the two roads, the atmosphere remains somber within the path of the forest. However, the tone becomes one of regret quickly. The narrator knows that the decision will have long term effects on the life that develops from the choice. â€Å"And sorry I could not travel both/ And be one traveler, long I stood,† reveals this sense of tension between making a conscious decision or leaving it up to fate (Frost 241). Standing present at the fork for a long time, allows for the tension to build between the narrator and nature, only furthering the somber tone. With the emphasis on contemplation, the reader learns that the poem is not simply about the paths. The paths are symbols for decision making; and the two components of that being individual choice or fate. With the narrator needing to make a decision, the tone changes to one of tension, which is expressed in the coming line. The narrator experiences this pressure with nature, but also with decision making. â€Å"And looked down one as far as I could/ To where it bent in the undergrowth,† reveals that only to one bend, on one path, can the narrator see what lies ahead (Frost 242). With the failure to see further down the path, the narrator places strain on themselves to make a decision that will have the best outcome. The two paths create a symbol for this anxiety in which individuals have on making decisions. The inability to predict the future forces an individual to place trust in

Entrepreneurs and Third Innovative Techniques

Question: Discuss about the Entrepreneurs and Third Innovative Techniques. Answer: Introduction The aim of this literature review is to learn and understand about the entrepreneurs and third innovative techniques that help them to be a successful entrepreneur. An entrepreneur is a person who is born with some natural traits so that they can be successful in their business (Parasuraman, 2010). They have the advantages to think out of the box and power to implement their unique ideas. In this way, the innovation and entrepreneur are deeply connected to each other (Smith, 2005). They are the inventors and discoverer of new and latest ideas in the business organizations. They have many qualities like risk taking. Innovators, resource allocators, deep thinker, think out of the box, etc. In this competitive world, it has become very important for companies to bring continuous innovation in the business organization. In order to sustain in the competition, innovation and change are the two pillars that help to gain competitive advantage (Chesbrough, Vanhaverbeke, West, 2014). The leaders of an organization are responsible in brining innovation. There is a need and requirement of the business organization and enterprises to be more creative and innovative. Creative leaders help the organizations to differentiate and innovation lead the same to have better ideas and information. In this present study, the motive is to learn innovation, its definition and also about the evolution of the innovation (Edquist, 2010). Literature review on innovation and its evolution First of all there is a need to understand what innovation all about is? Innovation refers to a situation in which the process of transformation takes place in which an idea or invention takes place into the goods and services so that a new value can be created in the old version for the customers and consumers (Lambert, Davidson, 2013). The innovation is a process which is simple related to the changes. The changes must be positive to the company, customers and also the other people who are related to the company (West, Lakhani, 2008). They can be stakeholders and employees also. The innovation is called as innovation only in few situation that are it must be economic in cost, not harmful to anyone , the idea must be new and fresh, imagination of the entrepreneur, and must satisfied the needs and wants of the customers (Edquist, 2010). It is related to the deliberate application of the imagination, information and also a type of initiative takes by the individuals to bring the change in the society, company, organization and many other places (George, McGahan, and Prabhu, 2012). The innovation only takes place when the imagination of developed ideas is practically applied o implemented in the reality (McLean, 2005). The innovation is of two types that is evolutionary innovation which is continuous and dynamic kind of innovation and it helps in bringing up of advancement in technology or new process in the companies (Bell, 2011). The other type is revolutionary innovation which is not continuous of discontinued after the changes take place. It can be disruptive and new also depending on the situation and condition (Osayawe McAndrew, 2005). The innovations and changes are synonymous with the risk taking. It helps the companies in creating new products and services by using new or old technologies by taking a huge amount of risk as they have to create new markets in the economy (Ordanini, Parasuraman, 2010). The innovation is generally related to the entrepreneurs as they are the one who are capable to take high risk. The imitators take less amount of risk thats why they cannot bring innovation (Fixsen, Naoom, Blase, Friedman, R. 2005). They are the people who start the business with the products of innovator and use most effective approaches and theories. Example- there is personal computer manufacturing companies like IBM with its personal computers that are against apple computers and laptops Compaq with its personal computers and cheap in the process against IBM Dell with its more cheap clones against Compaq (De, Frattini, Pizzurno, Cassia, 2015) A critical analysis on innovation The idea on innovation and evolution is directly related to the positive economic development and growth f the company that leads in the performance development and increase in the productivity (Pettigrew, Woodman, Cameron, 2001). The empirical evidence shows that the process of innovation has always bring positivity in the business organizations. They are the inventors and discoverer of new and latest ideas in the business organizations. They have many qualities like risk taking (Heller, Zavaleta, 2009). Innovators, resource allocators, deep thinker, think out of the box, etc. There is a need and requirement of the business organization and enterprises to be more creative and innovative. Creativity leaders help them to differentiate and innovation lead them to have better ideas and information. In a nutshell it says that innovations play a role of knowledge, information and dynamicity which gives an insight of growth and development process (Janssen, Schoon, Ke, Brner, 2006). A critical analysis on the approaches and designs of innovation The main purpose of these approaches and designs is to understand the perspective of the innovation and its theories. The innovation is a set of all the developed changes that are required to be done and apply. There are five criteria on which the innovation process depends that is strong sustainability, voluntary initiatives and design and innovative frameworks (Chrisman, Chua, Massis, Frattini, Wright, 2015). The design frame works help in designing the layout on which the innovation of organizations will take place. The changes are dependent on the measures, regulations, possibility to change, product-service innovation systems, etc. The approaches and designs of innovations must be sustainable in nature and they do not have any negative impact on any activity of the business (George, McGahan, and Prabhu, 2012). In order to achieve this, the organization first establish clear understanding by analyze and evaluate the type of innovation that will take place in the future. It provides them knowledge and future prospectus of innovation. The theory of innovation The theory of diffusion is the most relevant theory of innovation that seeks that how, why, ad what rate of innovation taken place. It also defines the ideas and technology that must be spread as an innovative process and progress (Keupp, Palmi, Gassmann, 2012). This theory also explains that there are four ways that can help to spread any innovative idea that are innovation itself, time, social system and also the communication channels (Markard, Raven, Truffer, 2012). It is the process that is dependent on the human capital. This thirty stares that the process of innovation can only be successful if it is highly implemented and acceptable by all (Dahlander, Gann, 2010). The innovation and self creation is one of the final ways to reach to the final destination of success (Smits, Kuhlmann, and Shapira, 2010). To bring innovation, one must hire talented and creative employees, analyze the market situations, work with innovative people, take idea for each and every thing, and apply all the ideas practically in the business organization. There are various types of categories of the adopters like innovators, early adopters, early majority, late majority and laggards (Lundvall, Joseph, Chaminade, Vang, 2011). Management of the innovation In order to manage the process of innovation, there is a requirement of innovation knowledge and talent in the business organization and entrepreneurs. The management of the innovation is a creative and challenging takes which can it be handled by all (Uyarra, 2010). Otherwise, everyone is creative and talented enough to think out of the box. But there are few who have the ability and guts to come forward and try to achieve their dream and change them into reality (Lusch, Nambisan, 2015). The innovation only takes place when the imagination of developed ideas is practically applied o implemented in the reality (McLean, 2005). Evolution The motive of the process of management and entrepreneurs is to make a framework of the procedures to that the organization can ensure that they are able to fulfill the current and future needs of the customers and the other people related to it (Metcalfe, Miles, 2012). The process of evolution refers to the changes takes place during the process of innovation. The theory of evolution is based on the ideas that all the things are required to be change with the time. It can be gradually or sudden. There are various types of variations takes place due to which the process of evolution initiate (Chesbrough, Vanhaverbeke, West, 2014). There is evolution in the process of management, technology, entrepreneurship, etc. evolution can be biological and technical (Chrisman, Chua, Massis, Frattini, Wright, 2015). In this study, the focus is on the technical evolution of the management and entrepreneurship process. The process of production, marketing, accounting, advertisement, human resource, etc are changing with the change in the time (Frow, Nenonen, Payne, Storbacka, 2015). It is the requirement of the time to bring changes and evolution. It is a part of life whether it is a life of an individual or any business organization. The obsolete things and people cannot survive for a longer period of time (Jensen, Johnson, Lorenz, Lundvall, 2007). The process of evolution has its three major phases that are transition, industrial revolution, and information revolution. The first process is transition where the human realized that changes can take place and they can take place by small innovations (Mothe, Paquet, 2012). The second phase of evolution is industrial revolution where the companies started and the entire economy has changed. The phase is of information revolution in which the introduction on internet taken place that has changed the entire system of the global economy (Greenhalgh et al, 2005). The theory of evolution There are various types of evolution theory that help the organization in better management of the business. The evolution of this business era takes place from the history of the management principle and theories. There were two theories that are scientific and bureaucratize management (Biber, Leavy, 2010). These theories help the companies to identify and analyze the culture of the organisation and the place where the transactions take place. There are various types of methods used to measure the impact of the evolution theory that is quantitative and qualitative methods (Perkmann, Walsh, 2007). The companies are now having various types of competing approaches to survive the competition and risk in the business organization (Bouncken, Gast, Kraus, Bogers, 2015). Conclusion The aim of this literature review is to critically analyze about the wider impact of the innovation at different levels of the organizations and its teams, members stakeholders, firms, projects, industries, etc. It can be concluded that the world has now become a global village which is highly competitive world full of complexities and challenges. Each and every business organization is facing issues in their survival. So, the innovation is the only way that can help them to survive the competition is this competitive world. There is a need and requirement of the business organization and enterprises to be more creative and innovative. Creativity leaders them to differentiate and innovation lead them to have better ideas and information. In this way by proper combination of these two elements the entrepreneurs can survive in this competitive world and also have competitive advantage. The innovation and self creation is one of the final ways to reach to the final destination of success. To bring innovation, one must hire talented and creative employees, analyze the market situations, work with innovative people, take idea for each and every thing, and apply all the ideas practically in the business organization. Thus, by building creativity and innovation in the organization, companies can ensure there development and growth in the future and they will surely succeed in the future. References Bell, F. (2011). Connectivism: Its place in theory-informed research and innovation in technology-enabled learning. The International Review Of Research In Open And Distributed Learning, 12(3), 98-118. Bouncken, R. B., Gast, J., Kraus, S., Bogers, M. (2015). Coopetition: a systematic review, synthesis, and future research directions. Review of Managerial Science, 9(3), 577-601. Chesbrough, H., Vanhaverbeke, W., West, J. (Eds.). (2014). New frontiers in open innovation. OUP Oxford. Chrisman, J. J., Chua, J. H., De Massis, A., Frattini, F., Wright, M. (2015). The ability and willingness paradox in family firm innovation. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 32(3), 310-318. Dahlander, L., Gann, D. M. (2010). How open is innovation?. Research policy, 39(6), 699-709. De la Mothe, J., Paquet, G. (Eds.). (2012). Local and regional systems of innovation (Vol. 14). Springer Science Business Media. De Massis, A., Frattini, F., Pizzurno, E., Cassia, L. (2015). Product innovation in family versus nonfamily firms: An exploratory analysis. Journal of Small Business Management, 53(1), 1-36. Edquist, C. (2010). Systems of innovation perspectives and challenges. African Journal of Science, Technology, Innovation and Development, 2(3), 14-45. Fixsen, D. L., Naoom, S. F., Blase, K. A., Friedman, R. M. (2005). Implementation research: a synthesis of the literature. Frow, P., Nenonen, S., Payne, A., Storbacka, K. (2015). Managing Co?creation Design: A Strategic Approach to Innovation. British Journal of Management, 26(3), 463-483. George, G., McGahan, A.M. and Prabhu, J., 2012. Innovation for inclusive growth: Towards a theoretical framework and a research agenda. Journal of management studies, 49(4), pp.661-683. Greenhalgh, T., Robert, G., Macfarlane, F., Bate, P., Kyriakidou, O. and Peacock, R., 2005. Storylines of research in diffusion of innovation: a meta-narrative approach to systematic review. Social science medicine, 61(2), pp.417-430. Heller, N. E., Zavaleta, E. S. (2009). Biodiversity management in the face of climate change: a review of 22 years of recommendations. Biological conservation, 142(1), 14-32. Hesse-Biber, S. N., Leavy, P. (Eds.). (2010). Handbook of emergent methods. Guilford Press. Janssen, M. A., Schoon, M. L., Ke, W., Brner, K. (2006). Scholarly networks on resilience, vulnerability and adaptation within the human dimensions of global environmental change. Global environmental change, 16(3), 240-252. Jensen, M. B., Johnson, B., Lorenz, E., Lundvall, B. . (2007). Forms of knowledge and modes of innovation. Research policy, 36(5), 680-693. Keupp, M. M., Palmi, M., Gassmann, O. (2012). The strategic management of innovation: A systematic review and paths for future research. International Journal of Management Reviews, 14(4), 367-390. Lambert, S. C., Davidson, R. A. (2013). Applications of the business model in studies of enterprise success, innovation and classification: An analysis of empirical research from 1996 to 2010. European Management Journal, 31(6), 668-681. Lundvall, B. ., Joseph, K. J., Chaminade, C., Vang, J. (Eds.). (2011). Handbook of innovation systems and developing countries: building domestic capabilities in a global setting. Edward Elgar Publishing. Lusch, R. F., Nambisan, S. (2015). Service Innovation: A Service-Dominant Logic Perspective. Mis Quarterly, 39(1), 155-175. Markard, J., Raven, R., Truffer, B. (2012). Sustainability transitions: An emerging field of research and its prospects. Research Policy, 41(6), 955-967. McLean, L. D. (2005). Organizational cultures influence on creativity and innovation: A review of the literature and implications for human resource development. Advances in developing human resources, 7(2), 226-246. Metcalfe, J. S., Miles, I. (Eds.). (2012). Innovation systems in the service economy: measurement and case study analysis (Vol. 18). Springer Science Business Media. Ordanini, A., Parasuraman, A. (2010). Service innovation viewed through a service-dominant logic lens: a conceptual framework and empirical analysis. Journal of Service Research, 1094670510385332. Osayawe Ehigie, B., McAndrew, E. B. (2005). Innovation, diffusion and adoption of total quality management (TQM). Management Decision, 43(6), 925-940. Parasuraman, A. (2010). Service productivity, quality and innovation: Implications for service-design practice and research. International Journal of Quality and Service Sciences, 2(3), 277-286. Perkmann, M., Walsh, K. (2007). Universityindustry relationships and open innovation: Towards a research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 9(4), 259-280. Pettigrew, A. M., Woodman, R. W., Cameron, K. S. (2001). Studying organizational change and development: Challenges for future research. Academy of management journal, 44(4), 697-713. Smith, K. H. (2005). Measuring innovation. Smits, R.E., Kuhlmann, S. and Shapira, P., 2010. The theory and practice of innovation policy: an international research handbook. Uyarra, E. (2010). What is evolutionary about regional systems of innovation? Implications for regional policy. Journal of evolutionary economics, 20(1), 115. West, J., Lakhani, K. R. (2008). Getting clear about communities in open innovation. Industry and Innovation, 15(2), 223-231.

Oil and Gas Management SR Limited

Question: Describe about the Oil and Gas Management of SR Limited? Answer: Introduction The report present a brief description of the SR Limited, an oil and gas exploration and production organization and main challenges they faced in terms of finance, drill test, field licensing, and various ethical issues (Rusco, 2009). The report is also analyzed the problem faced by SR Limited and some recommendation regarding each problem which SR faces. SR Limited has to face various problems regarding exploration and production of oil and gas (Inkpen and Moffett, 2011). SR Limited while testing their new field for exploration of oil and gas, getting confirm license for the new field and other process faces several problems which affect their business production (Anon, 2015). There outsourcing and partnership activities were affected by uncertain military attack. And it also made their workers life in danger due to which company has to stop their work for some time (Abbe, Grimes and Fowler, 2011). The recommendation mentioned in the report is after analyzing the reason behind the problems and the other causes which affects the business process of SR Limited. Challenges faced by SR Limited SR Limited being an oil and gas company while drill well process they have to face various challenges in relation to finance, ethics, location, political disturbance and others. The main challenges faced by SR Limited as mentioned in the case study are when they have to increase their financial level for testing drill in new oil and gas fields (Ikonnikova et al., 2014). To increase business, SR Limited has to increase their expenses and expenditure cost (Chandra, 2011). While drill test process for new fields' organization faced several problems regarding the size of the field, drilling length for finding oil and expenditure cost (Chaudhry, 2004).The main dependency of the organization is on fossil fuels and natural fuels. So if in future fuel finishes in any one refinery SR Limited have to drill new refinery or close the production (Jacoby, 2012). The future of fuels used by SR Limited for the final product development is not which always keep their drilling and search of new fields on (Jacobs, 2011). As mentioned in the case study the main factor which can stop their process anytime is local or country government (Corrigendum, 2013). SR Limited all mechanism and process are controlled and directed by the government and this process of controlling and directing in SR Limited is as corporate governance (Abbe, Grimes, and Fowler). The corporate governance structure of SR Limited can affect the affair of their stakeholders, customers and others (Inkpen and Moffett, 2011). As mentioned in the case study the other problem faced by SR Limited while boring holes for oil and gas in UK is Corporate Social Responsibility (Corrigendum, 2013). CSR helps SR Limited to work under rules and regulation as mentioned by the government regarding oil and gas industry (Ikonnikova et al., 2014). As mentioned in the case study at Apache field both SR and Boring Holes UK have started working together (Ikonnikova et al., 2014). But after sometimes it was found that due to military att ack government and the whole country is in danger which also affects the work of SR and Boring Holes UK Limited (Jacobs, 2011). As SR outsources its production work to other oil and gas organization worldwide, which sometimes make difficult for SR to manage their outsourced work (Douglass, 2011). SR plans it long term process plan taking into consideration their requirement of fossil fuels. But it may happen that the fossil fuel and renewable resources disappears which can affect SR production process (Jin and Bai, 2011). The challenges which are faced by SR Limited mainly are Limited quantity of fossil fuels, and other non-renewable resources used by them in comparison to demand and the size of their oil field (Ikonnikova et al., 2014). Oil and gas industry like SR Limited has three main business parts as upstream, midstream and downstream. Upstream is involved in exploration a production of oil and gas if the process of upstream is affected then the midstream and downstream will a lso be affected (Inkpen and Moffett, 2011). The problem faced by SR Limited while production and exploration of oil and gas are due to internal factors as employees, policies, rules and regulation of the company (Inkpen and Moffett). On the other hand, the external factors which may affect the production and exploration of oil and gas are the government bodies, rules and regulation of the local and other government bodies as well as the surrounding of the workplace or field. Analysis of the problem faced by SR Limited SR Limited while exploration and production of oil and gas have to face various problem due to internal and external factors. The internal factors due to which problem arises are the policies, rules and regulation of SR Limited regarding their business, partnership and outsourcing (Inkpen and Moffett, 2011). As per the case study, SR Limited was unable to get the license for the fourth field in Hetty due to their insufficient expenditure cost decided by them (Ikonnikova et al., 2014). The cost which SR decided for testing field and drill test was not sufficient and further due to insufficient cash they were unable to raise expenditure limit (Jacobs, 2011). The financial capacity of SR was weak in comparison to other organization working for exploration and production of oil and gas (Inkpen and Moffett, 2012). As mentioned in the case study, SR Limited is not sure about their financial support for conducting the test of the three fields (Abbe, Grimes and Fowler, 2011). The limited amo unt of fossil fuel and renewable energy resources in the future can affect the production of oil and gas (Jacoby, 2012). If suppose in future fossil fuel or renewable resource stock or production ends then either SR Limited have to search new field for oil and gas drilling or have to stop their production completely (Jin and Bai, 2011). SR Limited outsources their work to other oil and gas industry so that the workload is reduced by sometimes the work is not completed within the allocated time which affects both SR Limited and other production (Jin and Bai, 2011). The main reason mentioned in the case study, which affect the production and exploration of oil and gas in SR Limited are political interference, change in rules and regulations of government (Jin and Bai, 2011). In the case study, it is discussed that one of the companies with whom SR Limited used to work was affected due to military attack on the area (Corrigendum, 2013). The main problems which SR Limited has to face ar e due to their corporate governance, corporate social responsibilities, financial capability and others (Kolosova, 2011). As discussed in the case study, the SR Limited so not properly make the estimation regarding licensing, exploration and production process which later on affects the SR Limited business process (Norwood, 2014). Before starting any new work, every organization should make their business process plan properly. As represented in the case study, SR Limited did not have any proper plan regarding their work process and estimation which every time affected their work (Lebedko, 2014). The problem faced by SR Limited while licensing was due to their insufficient cash availability for payment, which affected testing process of different new fields and drill well process which they have to conduct before production of oil and gas starts (Abbe, Grimes, and Fowler, 2009). Recommendations As a management consultant of SR Limited, the recommendation for the above-discussed problems are first of all SR Limited should work on increasing their financial capability. So that they do not face licensing problem in future due to lack or insufficient finance (Corrigendum, 2013). Financially SR can be strong by keeping some amount of cash in safe for future use or in case or crisis (Lun, 2013). SR Management should try to keep their employees work in a team as per the rules and regulation decided by SR Limited Management (Oil Gas Monitor, 2015). When SR Limited undergoes the negotiation process, it should be done in ethical way. Oil and gas production is dependent on fossil fuels and renewable energy resources (Inkpen and Moffett). So to perform continuous work in future SR Limited should try to keep some amount of fossil fuel in safe (Kolosova, 2011). And avoid the wastage of resources during production, organization should train their employees for this (Norwood, 2014). Organ ization should always perform their work in ethical manner and evaluate the positive and negative effect of their business process on surrounding and society (Oil Gas Monitor, 2015). As mentioned in the case study, business process of SR Limited was affected by the military attack. It represents that oil and gas exploration, and production is dependent on government as well as the other government bodies (Rusco, 2009). SR Limited should try to work with coordination with both local government body and other (Oil Gas Monitor, 2015). The suggestion regarding coordination with government bodies is that SR Limited should always plan their business process by taking into consideration all the government bodies (Abbe, Grimes and Fowler, 2011). Before deciding any site or field for oil and gas drilling SR Limited should analyze location, size of the field, involvement of government bodies and society in that area and other factors (Rusco, n.d.). SR Limited should try to work as per the s tep process i.e. when drill test of field is required they should do it otherwise the production cycle of oil and gas will be affected (Kolosova, 2011). SR Limited should always try to focus on the initial processes like planning regarding their work, business environment, policies, expenditure cost and others (Rusco, 2009). If SR Limited had estimated their cost for exploration, productions, outsourcing and other process involved in production and exploration (Rusco, 2009). Then at the time of the drill testing and licensing they would have not faced financial and ethical problem (Rusco, 2009). Suppose SR Limited has to start drill well process in any new location so before starting the process they should analyze different factors as cost of land, surrounding of field. And then later on decide availability of the fossil fuel and natural resources, coordination of government and local bodies, availability of a transport so that the resources and final products can be outsourced, ru les and regulation of government regarding that specific field, and other factors (Rusco, 2009). The long term plan or future plan developed by the organization should be in favor of their workforce, company profit share, stakeholders and economy (Chaudhry, 2004). Long term plan should be done by taking into consideration availability of renewable resources and fossil fuels used in the production of oil and gas (Sharma, n.d.). SR Limited should try to influence their workforce as a team for better performance. On the other hand, SR Limited should try to provide their employees security in oil and gas production areas so that they are influenced automatically towards the company. Conclusion By the above discussion, it can be concluded that SR Limited is oil and gas exploration and production organization which currently is facing several problems regarding their finance, surrounding, in sourcing and long term and other internal and external factor (Chaudhry, 2004). As mentioned in the case study, SR Limited is completely dependent on fossil fuels and renewable resources and if in future they get exhausted the production will be affected (Sorrentino et al., 2010). There is a brief explanation of the various reasons which affect the production and exploration of SR Limited oil and gas (Inkpen and Moffett). As a management consultant, the recommendation and suggestion mentioned in the report are after analyzing the whole scenario of SR Limited present in the case study (Anon, 2015). The major problem as mentioned in the case study is the financial ability of SR Limited due to which managers of organization are unable to decide whether they can conduct test and drill well p rocess completely or not (Sorrentino et al., 2010). Above report is having brief analysis of the problem faced by SR Limited during their production and exploration process of oil and gas. References Abbe, O., Grimes, S. and Fowler, G. (2011). Decision support for the management of oil well drill cuttings.Proceedings of the ICE - Waste and Resource Management, 164(4), pp.213-220. Anon, (2015). [online] Available at: https://beyondeconomics.files.wordpress.com/2009/09/corporate-governance-in-the-major-oil-companies_-searle-may2010.pdf [Accessed 11 Mar. 2015]. Chandra, K. (2011). What is an ethnic party?.Party Politics, 17(2), pp.151-169. Chaudhry, A. (2004).Oil well testing handbook. Amsterdam: Elsevier/Gulf Professional. Corrigendum. (2013).Party Politics, 19(2), pp.377-377. Corrigendum. (2013).Party Politics, 19(5), pp.851-851. Douglass, L. (2011). Conclusions: Long-term management of Lennox-Gastaut syndrome: Future directions.Epilepsia, 52, pp.28-28. Ikonnikova, S., Browning, J., Horvath, S. and Tinker, S. (2014). Well Recovery, Drainage Area, and Future Drill-Well Inventory: Empirical Study of the Barnett Shale Gas Play.SPE Reservoir Evaluation Engineering. Inkpen, A. and Moffett, M. (2011).The global oil gas industry. Tulsa, Okla.: PennWell. Jacobs, A. (2011).Governing for the long term. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Jacoby, D. (2012).Optimal supply chain management in oil, gas, and power generation. Tulsa, Okla.: PennWell Corp. Jin, Z. and Bai, Y. (2011). Sustainable Development and Long-Term Strategic Management: Embedding a Long-Term Strategic Management System into Medium and Long-Term Planning.World Future Review, 3(2), pp.49-69. Kolosova, O. (2011). Problems of salaries management in oil and gas companies.EoR, pp.167-175. Lebedko, A. (2014). Scope of state involvement in the management of oil and gas complex.OGBUS, (1), pp.397-411. Lun, Y. (2013).Oil transport management. London: Springer. Norwood, G. (2014).Profiting from Property in a Recession. Hoboken: Taylor and Francis. Oil Gas Monitor, (2015).The Top Six Issues and Opportunities Facing the Oil and Gas Industry in 2013. [online] Available at: https://www.oilgasmonitor.com/top-issues-opportunities-facing-oil-gas-industry-2013/4080/ [Accessed 11 Mar. 2015]. Rusco, F. (2009).Federal oil and gas management. [Washington, D.C.]: U.S. Govt. Accountability Office. Rusco, F. (2009).Oil and gas management. [Washington, D.C.]: U.S. Govt. Accountability Office. Rusco, F. (n.d.).Oil and gas management, continued attention to Interior's human capital challenges is needed : testimony before the Subcommittee on Energy and Mineral Resources, Committee on Natural Resources, House of Representatives. Sharma, D. (n.d.).The outsourcer. Sorrentino, M., Arsie, I., Di Martino, R. and Rizzo, G. (2010). On the Use of Genetic Algorithm to Optimize the On-board Energy Management of a Hybrid Solar Vehicle.Oil Gas Science and Technology, 65(1), pp.133-143.